Alcohol Research Group

  • Research
    • Overview
    • Disparities
    • Environment
    • Epidemiology
    • Health
    • International
    • Methodology
    • Policy
    • Treatment & Recovery
    • Intervention Trials
  • The Center
    • About
          • ABOUT THE CENTER

            • History, Mission, & Focus
          • MEET THE DIRECTOR


            Senior Scientist, William (Bill) C. Kerr, PhD, is Director of ARG’s National Alcohol Research Center and Co-Directs the National Alcohol Survey and the Health Disparities projects.  Bill also serves as the scientific director at ARG and continues to lead R01 projects, including a grant to investigate secondhand harms from alcohol and other drugs.

            Learn more

    • People
          • THE CENTER TEAM

            • Center Leadership
            • Scientific Advisory Board
            • Research Partners
          • MEET THE ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR

            Scientist Nina Mulia, DrPH, is Center Associate Director and Director of the Alcohol Services project. She specializes in and has published widely on race and ethnicity and socioeconomic disparities in heavy drinking, alcohol problems, and alcohol services utilization.

            Learn more 

    • Research
          • CENTER RESEARCH

            • Cores
            • Research Projects
            • Affiliated Research
          • ASSESSING HID OVER THE LIFECOURSE

            This project, led by Camillia Lui, PhD, traces trends in harmful drinking patterns over a 40-year period, and identifies a range of alcohol-related precursors and problems through event-based and population-based approaches to inform early screening and interventions for high-risk groups.

            Learn more

    • National Alcohol Surveys
          • ABOUT THE SURVEY

            • About the National Alcohol Survey
            • NAS Datasets
            • Get Access to the NAS data
          • MEET THE SURVEY CO-DIRECTOR

            Scientist and Deputy Scientific Director, Priscilla Martinez, oversees the survey design, data collection, and analyses.  In the latest cycle of the NAS, Priscilla conducted dried blood spot sampling to help better understand the relationship between how our immune systems work and what role they might play in how alcohol use can affect our mental health.

            Learn more

  • Training Program
        • OVERVIEW

          • About the Training Program
          • Predoctoral Fellowship
          • Postdoctoral Fellowship
          • Seminars
        • APPLY NOW

          • Predoctoral Fellowship Application
          • Postdoctoral Fellowship Application
        • TRAINING STAFF

          • Faculty & Mentors
          • Current Fellows
  • Impacts
    • New Findings
    • In the News
    • Press Release
    • Publications
  • Data & Resources
    • Datasets
  • About
    • History
    • Mission, Vision, Values & Goals
    • Governance
    • Staff
    • Library
    • Employment
    • Support ARG
  • Donate

Washington Regrets Vote to End Monopoly

June 28, 2016 by

Washington


Washington State residents who voted in favor of privatizing liquor sales were eight times more likely to express a desire to change their original vote than residents who voted against the measure, according to a study from the Alcohol Research Group, a program of the Public Health Institute, published today in the Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs.

Findings suggested that 20 percent of individuals who voted in 2011 to end the government monopoly on liquor sales have changed their minds after living with the impact of the initiative for the past few years. Initiative 1183, which came into effect in July 2012, called for closing state-run liquor stores and allowing state licensing of private retailers.

“Our study not only shows that many people changed their minds about privatization, but more importantly, those who now say they wish they had voted no might have been a large enough group to defeat the measure in 2011, had they known its real impact at the time,” said lead author Meenakshi Sabina Subbaraman, Ph.D., a biostatistician with the Alcohol Research Group.

“We also found that the people who changed their minds appeared to be more concerned with the increase in the number of liquor stores available after the vote than they were about alcohol abuse among youth or the fact that alcohol now costs more,” said Subbaraman.

As of 2015, there were approximately 1,600 stores in Washington selling spirits, compared with 330 stores before privatization. The state’s new tax rates on spirits are, by far, the highest in the country.

“The lack of concern about tax rates was surprising considering that liquor prices have increased from 5 to 15 percent on average since privatization, depending on container size,” said William C. Kerr, Ph.D., a senior scientist at the Alcohol Research Group who co-authored the study and has published previously on the results of the Washington State initiative. “It seems that voters had a strong reaction to seeing liquor in many types of stores where it wasn’t available before.”

The study used data from a large general population sample of over 1,200 adults surveyed in 2014 to look at the relationship between characteristics including demographics, spirits use and voting choice and how these factors are related to the desire to change one’s vote.

There are currently 17 states in the U.S. that control the sale of liquor—and, in some cases, wine—at the wholesale level through government agencies, including Washington’s neighboring states of Oregon and Idaho. Grocers and other groups in some of these states often push for ending the government monopoly. Earlier this year, grocers in Oregon were aiming to put an initiative to privatize sales on the state’s November ballot. And Pennsylvania is making steps to ease state control by permitting wine sales in grocery stores and direct shipments to homes from out of state.

“Perhaps if we can better predict what such a change in policy will look like, people will have more confidence in their vote,” said Subbaraman. “Residents of other states that are considering liquor privatization should be aware that enough yes-voters in Washington changed their minds after the fact that, were the election to be held today, the state would likely vote to keep the monopoly.”

Download the paper or view the abstract.


Subbaraman, M. S. & Kerr, W. C. (July 2016). Opinions on the privatization of distilled-spirits sales in Washington State: Did voters change their minds? Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 77(4), 568-576.

Research reported in this press release was supported by National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism of the National Institutes of Health under award number R01AA021742.

The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

If you are interested in arranging an interview with Meenakshi Sabina Subbaraman, Ph.D., or William C., Kerr, Ph.D., contact Diane Schmidt at (510) 898-5819 or dschmidt@arg.org.

Latest News

May 13th, 2025
Substance Use and Mental Health Risks Among U.S. College Students
May 2nd, 2025
The Long-Term Impact of Childhood Adversity on Adolescent and Young Adult Substance Use
April 10th, 2025
Understanding Mental Health, Substance Use, and Suicide Risk Among Youth
April 8th, 2025
How Flawed Science Could Shape U.S. Alcohol Guidelines
April 2nd, 2025
New Study Reveals Why Alcohol Use Increased During the Pandemic

Recent Findings

April 2nd, 2025
New Study Reveals Why Alcohol Use Increased During the Pandemic
November 23rd, 2024
Data disaggregation reveals hidden suicide risk
November 21st, 2024
Millions of Americans Hurt By Others’ Drinking, Drug Use: Study
September 4th, 2024
Alcohol Consumption Trends Across Disadvantaged Populations
June 4th, 2024
Socioeconomic status may determine how alcohol affects heart health

Newsletter Sign-up

Who We Are

About ARG

We are a non-profit research organization that seeks to improve public health through deepening our understanding of alcohol and other drug use and investigating innovative approaches to reduce its consequences for individuals, families, and communities.

  • Land Acknowledgement
  • History
  • Leadership
  • Staff
  • Job Opportunities
  • Accessibility Policy

What We Do

  • Mission, Vision, Values
  • Research Overview
  • National Alcohol Research Center
  • Methodology
  • Training

Newsroom

  • Access Our Data
  • In the News
  • Press Releases
  • Get in Touch

Connect with Us

Social

© 2025 Alcohol Research Group. Website Design and Development by HyperArts