More Paths to Successful Sobriety than Just Alcoholics Anonymous, Says New Study
Alternative Mutual Help Groups are Viable Options to Traditional 12-step Groups
People with an alcohol use disorder who participated in alternative mutual help groups had abstinence outcomes equivalent to those who participated in traditional 12-step groups at the same level, a new study from Senior Scientist and Center Associate Director Sarah E. Zemore and colleagues. This is the first longitudinal, comparative study of 12-step groups and their alternatives, including Women for Sobriety (WFS), LifeRing Secular Recovery (LifeRing), and SMART Recovery (SMART).
There has been little evidence to-date on the effectiveness of mutual help groups besides 12-step groups like Alcoholics Anonymous (AA). This study points to a range of viable options for people who seek sobriety support, and especially those who object to some of the underlying principles of 12-step groups. Results suggest that mutual help group involvement—measured as meeting attendance; having a regular or home group; having a close friend or sponsor in the group; leading, convening, or facilitating meetings; and doing volunteer or service work—offers equivalent benefits in relation to substance use and problems regardless of group choice.
“We know that participation in AA and other 12-step groups contributes to recovery from alcohol and drug problems, but until now, almost nothing has been known about the efficacy of alternatives to the 12-step approach,” said Zemore. “Our findings showed that participation in three major, secular alternatives to 12-step groups yielded the same benefits for recovery from an alcohol use disorder as did participation in 12-step groups—even though the philosophies of these alternatives are very different from AA’s philosophy. This is exciting news, because it suggests that there are several good choices for individuals seeking a recovery support group.”
Further results indicated that having an alcohol recovery goal of lifetime abstinence was a powerful predictor of better substance use outcomes, regardless of the individual’s primary mutual help group. Those with a goal of lifetime total abstinence had 5.2 times the odds of alcohol abstinence vs. those with any other goal. This suggests that, in addition to making referrals to multiple mutual help groups, practitioners should encourage clients’ commitment to lifetime abstinence and develop a care plan that supports this goal.
Zemore and her study team believe their findings help address a gap in the recovery literature by providing initial support for mutual help group options that may align more closely with individual core values and needs. They also seek greater understanding among providers, and those who mandate care, to ensure that such options are made available, which will improve access and efficacy for treatment seekers.
“I hope that our results increase awareness of and referral to WFS, LifeRing, and SMART, so that more people can find a group that works for them, stick with that group, and ultimately recover,” Zemore added.
The study, called the Peer Alternatives in Addiction (PAL) Study, collected longitudinal data from current participants of 12-step groups, WFS, LifeRing, and SMART. Study respondents were surveyed three times over a 12-month period beginning with 651 baseline respondents. Collected measures included past-30-day meeting attendance and other indicators of mutual help group involvement, alcohol and drug use and severity, alcohol recovery goal, and other clinical and demographic variables.
Zemore, S.E., Liu, C., Mericle, A., Hemberg, J., Kaskutas, L.A. (2018).A longitudinal study of the comparative efficacy of Women for Sobriety, LifeRing, SMART Recovery, and 12-step groups for those with AUD. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment: https://www.journalofsubstanceabusetreatment.com/article/S0740-5472(17)30490-7/abstract
For more information on the PAL Study, see: Zemore, S.E., Kaskutas, L.A., Mericle, A., Hemberg, J. (2016). Comparison of 12-step groups to mutual help alternatives for AUD in a large, national study: differences in membership characteristics and Group participation, cohesion, and satisfaction., 73, 16-26. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment.
Research reported in this press release was supported by the U.S. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) of the National Institutes of Health under award number R21AA022747. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of NIAAA or the National Institutes of Health.
If you are interested in arranging an interview with Sarah E. Zemore, PhD, please contact Diane Schmidt, Communications Specialist at the Alcohol Research Group at (510) 898- 5819 or dschmidt@arg.org.
