Alcohol Research Group

  • Donate
  • Contact Us
  • Research
    • Overview
    • Publications
    • Disparities
    • Environment
    • Epidemiology
    • Health
    • International
    • Intervention Trials
    • Methodology
    • Policy
    • Treatment & Recovery
  • Alcohol Disparities Research Center
    • About
    • People
      • Center Leadership
      • Scientific Advisory Board
      • Research Partnerships
    • Research
      • Cores
      • Research Projects
      • National Alcohol Surveys
      • Affiliated Research
    • Impacts
    • Training Program
  • Our Impacts
    • Publications
    • Press Releases
    • ARG in the News
  • Training
    • NIAAA Training Program
    • Faculty & Mentors
    • Predoctoral Fellowship
    • Postdoctoral Fellowship
    • Seminars
    • Current Fellows
  • About Us
    • History
    • Mission, Vision, Values & Goals
    • Governance
    • Staff
    • Library
    • Support ARG
    • Employment
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • News & Events
    • Health Guides
    • Datasets
    • Press Releases
    • ARG in the News

Alcohol Policies Are More Effective for Some Groups than Others

February 6, 2020 by


Increasing taxes on specific types of alcohol and implementing policies that reduce its availability have differing effects on specific subgroups according to a new study from ARG biostatistician  Meenakshi Sabina Subbaraman and colleagues. The study, published in Addiction, is the first to address gaps in alcohol policy research by examining how such broad-based initiatives aimed at reducing drinking and its related consequences vary across gender and racial/ethnic groups.

Results showed that increased state beer taxes led to an overall reduction in beer consumption and volume in the general population. However, when analyzing subgroup effects, only white and African American women drank less beer while the latter group also consumed a lower percentage of alcohol by volume (%ABV).

In assessing the impact of alcohol availability policies, such as government control of sales and outlet density, findings again varied across subgroups. For instance, white men living in a state with government-controlled spirit sales reduced both overall drinking and beer volume, and had 17% lower odds of alcohol-related consequences. Decreased bar density was also protective for both Hispanic women and men.

Meenakshi Sabina Subbaraman, PhD

“This is the first study to examine beverage-specific tax and availability policies and their associations with alcohol outcomes across demographic subgroups,” said Subbaraman. “While alcohol taxation and availability restrictions are among the most effective methods for reducing alcohol use and its problems, understanding who responds to specific policies can better inform interventions aimed at addressing disparities between groups.”

Overall, the study confirms the strength of tax and availability policies on alcohol use. It also brings much-needed awareness of how broad-based polices affect subgroups differently thereby reducing, or in some cases, possibly exacerbating already-existing disparities.

“Efforts by community members to limit alcohol availability in their neighborhoods might help leverage local support while promoting the social and public health benefits to both minority and non-minority residents alike to ensure everyone benefits,” Subbaraman added.

The researchers used data from three cycles of the National Alcohol Survey (NAS) from 2000 to 2015 (n = 28,251). The NAS is a cross-sectional survey of United States residents over the age of 18 across 50 states conducted every five years.


Subbaraman, MS, Mulia, N, Kerr, WC, Patterson, D, Karriker-Jaffe, KJ, Greenfield, TK. (2019) Relationships between US state alcohol policies and alcohol outcomes: differences by gender and race/ethnicity. Addiction: https://doi.org/10.1111/add.14937

Support for this research was provided by the US National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under award P50AA005595 (Kerr, PI). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIAAA or NIH.

Latest News

May 11th, 2023
Availability of alcohol to-go drinks and home delivery soared during the first year of the pandemic
May 2nd, 2023
Congratulations to ARG’s New Scientific Leadership Team
April 28th, 2023
ARG Scientific Director Steps Down, Leaves Behind a Lasting Legacy
April 1st, 2023
COVID-19 study finds striking inequities in access to health care during the pandemic
March 3rd, 2023
Rewriting Trauma Care for Sexual Minorities: A Profile of Cat Munroe

Recent Findings

May 11th, 2023
Availability of alcohol to-go drinks and home delivery soared during the first year of the pandemic
April 1st, 2023
COVID-19 study finds striking inequities in access to health care during the pandemic
January 10th, 2023
Effects of Medicaid expansion on alcohol and opioid treatment admissions in racial and ethnic groups
September 8th, 2022
Study reveals inequities in alcohol screenings, resulting in missed opportunities for treatment
June 26th, 2022
New COVID-19 Study Finds More Drinking, but Fewer Drinkers

Newsletter Sign-up

Public Health Institute
  • © 2023   Alcohol Research Group
  • Public Health Institute
  • 6001 Shellmound St,, Suite 450
    Emeryville CA 94608
    • Privacy Policy
    • Accessibility Policy
  • About Us
  • National Alcohol Research Center
  • Training
  • Resources & Tools

Stay Connected

NEWSLETTER SIGN UP

© 2023 Alcohol Research Group - Responsive WordPress Website by HyperArts